hi metatron-
Curious what your thoughts on Sheldrake's "morphic field" theory
are. personally, I think it is a fallacy. There are lots of "dragons" on the genomic map -- unknown regions. We don't know if NO mechanism to transmit experiences of a parent to child exist.
Maybe Lamarck's ideas should not totally be discredited. Even if the child animal is raised apart from it's parent's, it still has the parent's genetic material.
Like the fallacy that humans only use 10% of our brains (used to
support crap like ESP). If that is the case, which 90% of your brain
would you care to part with? The fallicy DOES have a grain of truth
-- only 10% of the brain is active at any ONE time. But, over a
reasonable period of time 100% of the brain is active. In my opinion, Sheldrake's experiments are finding the grains of truth to support a fallacy.
Maybe I'm closed minded on the subject. Thomas Huxley once said "It is the customary fate of new truths to begin as heresies."
honestly, I hope I am.
uncy